High Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction Under Article 227 To Monitor Progress Of Cases Before Fora Below
Case: Firoz Ahmad V. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi And Ors
Coram: Justice C Hari Shankar
Case No.: CM(M) 636/2022
Court Observation: “It is not possible for this Court, exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to monitor the progress of cases before the fora below,”
“Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be exercised only in cases where the forum, subject to the superintending jurisdiction of this Court, acts in a manner which calls for supervisory correction,”
“This Court is unaware of the number of matters pending before the learned SCDRC or the work constraint under which it is operating,”
“The learned SCDRC would take a call on the urgency of the petitioner’s matter keeping in view the number of matters pending before it and other matters which may be of a greater vintage or more urgent,”
Previous Posts
Adjudicating Authority Cannot Substitute Any Commercial Term Of Resolution Plan Approved By Committee Of Creditors Download Judgement
Related Articles
- Article 227 Confers Supervisory Jurisdiction, High Court Cannot Consider Such Submissions That Were Not Raised Before Court Below: Delhi HC
- Article 227 Not Mercy Jurisdiction, Litigants Casually Prosecuting Proceedings Before Lower Courts Can’t Expect Sanctuary From High Court: Delhi HC
- Judges Cannot Be Experts In All Fields, Experts’ Opinion Cannot Be Supplanted By A Court Overstepping Its Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

