Applicability Of Res Judicata Between Co-Defendants: Supreme Court Explains

Published by Admin on

Case: Union of India vs. S. Narasimhulu Naidu (Dead)

Coram: Coram: Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta

Case No: CA 2049 OF 2013

Court Observation: “Though the first suit is between the same parties, but the subject matter is not the same. For res judicata to apply, the matter in the former suit must have been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted, expressly or impliedly by the other. Since the issue in the suit was restricted to 4971.5 sq. 36 yards, the decree would be binding qua to that extent only. The issue cannot be said to be barred by constructive res judicata as per Explanation IV as it applies to the plaintiff in a later suit. The appellants have denied the claim of the plaintiffs in the first suit to the extent that it was the subject matter of that suit alone. Therefore, the decree in the first suit will not operate as res judicata in the subsequent matters”

Previous Posts

Domestic Violence Act Cannot Be Used As A Ploy By Son To Claim Father’s Property On The Strength Of Wife’s Right Of Residence: Delhi HC

Economic Criterion Cannot Be The Sole Basis For Identifying ‘Creamy Layer’: Supreme Court

(CPC) Court May Grant Leave Under Order XI Rule 5 To File New Documents Not Filed With Plaint: Delhi High Court

Reservation Category Person Can’t Claim Quota Benefits Simultaneously In Two Successor States: Supreme Court

B.Ed In Biological Science Eligible Qualification For HAS (Natural Science) Post: Supreme CourtDownload Judgement

Right Of Equity Of Redemption Of Mortgage Is Subsidiary To Right Of Ownership: Supreme Court

Whether A Deed Is Of Absolute Transfer Or Mortgage By Conditional Sale? Intention Of Parties Determines: Supreme Court

Payment Of Gratuity Act – No Retrospective Effect For 2010 Amendment Enhancing Gratuity Upper Limit As Rs 10 Lakhs: Supreme Court

Right To Shelter Does Not Mean Right To Government Accommodation: Supreme Court

Application For Initiating CIRP Has To Be Rejected If A Dispute Truly Exists In Fact And Is Not Spurious, Hypothetical Or Illusory: Supreme Court


0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Hey, wait!

Don't forget to subscribe to our newsletter for weekly updates about our events, blogs and various opportunities.