KAAPA | The High Court clarifies that subsequent detention cannot exceed 6 months if the ‘first detention’ order was passed prior to the 2014 amendment

Case: Prabhulla P v. State of Kerala

Coram: Justices Muhammed Mustaque and Shoba Annamma Eapen

Case No.: WP (Crl) No. 852 of 2023

Court Observation: “Section 12 of the KAAPA would operate only prospectively in regard to the period of detention. In the sense, the first detention order must have been after 31.12.2014…”

“That cannot be taken into account for imposing maximum one year detention after 31.12.2014. There is no embargo under the law to detain such persons, who was detained prior to 31.12.2014 for a period of six months,”

Previous Posts

The acceptance of rent by the landlord after the receipt of a quit notice from the tenant does not constitute a waiver of the quit notice: Kerala High Court

Considering an employee’s absence as ‘dies-non’ is a punitive measure that cannot be imposed without providing an opportunity for a hearing: J&K High Court

An employee opting for promotion under the diploma quota is deemed ineligible for further promotion under the degree qualification quota: Kerala High Court

Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, the State Religious Trust Board is obligated to adhere to the principles of natural justice and hear the affected person: Patna High Court

The Gujarat High Court nullifies an income tax assessment order citing violations of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act

Related Articles

• Kerala Preventive Detention Law High Court Confines Operation Of Externment Order Issued With Four Months Delay
• Detaining Authority Must Be Aware That Detenu Is Already In Custody & Must Show Compelling Reasons To Pass Preventive Detention Order: Kerala HC
• Kerala High Court clarifies that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to condone delay in filing a plea challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act