Courts Should Allow Parties To Let In Oral And Documentary Evidence In Guardianship Matters
Case: A. Shaamsudeen Raja v Raneesha P.V.
Coram: Justice M.Duraiswamy and Justice Sunder Mohan
Case No: O.S.A.No.152 of 2022
Court Observation: “It is settled law that while deciding the Original Petition to appoint the guardian the courts should allow the party to let in oral and documentary evidences. In such view of the matter, on that ground alone, the order passed by the learned Single Judge in O.P.No.423 of2020 is liable to be set aside.”
Previous Posts
Dispute Arising Out Of Agreements Relating To Property Used Exclusively In ‘Trade & Commerce’ Constitutes “Commercial Dispute”: Gujarat High Court
Bombay High Court Warns Principal Chief Commissioners Of Customs For Non-Representation In Cases
Intention Of Parties A Key Factor To Ascertain Benami Transactions: Kerala High Court
Gift Deed Not Effective When Possession Not Handed Over; Can Be Cancelled: Madras High Court
Supreme Court Bars Charging Compound Interest Or Penal Interest On Any Borrower During Loan Moratorium; Refuses Moratorium Extension Download Judgement
Previous Posts
Oral And Documentary Evidence, Guardianship Matters
Related Articles
- Madras HC Illustrates Parameters To Determine What Is ‘Urgent Interim Relief’ To Avoid Pre-Institution Mediation U/S 12A Commercial Courts Act
- Section 119 Evidence Act | Madras High Court Lays Down Principles For Examining Witnesses Who Are Unable To Speak
- ‘Let Down All Education’: Madras HC Upholds Doctor’s Suspension For Creating Fake Medical Certificate For Land Grabbing
