State Intervention in Arbitration – permissibility, and extent

  • Post category:Blog
  • Reading time:7 mins read

State Intervention in Arbitration

Written by: Kanishka Sharma

The evolution of arbitration law in India contains a long-running history. Trendy Arbitration was 1st introduced throughout the British Republic of India in 1772 through the geographic region rules.  However, the eventually Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into being. Within the initial stage, once a dispute arises with relevance the appointment of a go-between, essentially needs the court’s intervention. Throughout the proceedings, the court’s intervention is needed to help the proceedings. Also, once the mediation award is said, judicial intervention is needed for either the social control of the award or to challenge it.

Section 5 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

“With all something contained in the other law for the nonce good, in matters ruled by this half, no judicial authority shall intervene except wherever thus provided during this half.”

Court Intervention, once an Arbitration Agreement Exists

Court of alternative Judicial Authority doesn’t intervene in any arbitration proceedings or arbitration award. The law of non-intervention is predicated on the premise that once parties to any industrial contract by their own consent have determined to resolve their disputes, by the method of mediation and conciliation through the method of arbitration, then the judiciary wouldn’t have any reason to intervene during this continuing of arbitration.

Section 8:  It provides that if an Arbitration Agreement exists between the parties, the judicial courts, shall initially instant, refer any matter brought before them, for thought through arbitration. The court’s area unit is authorized to think about any matter; wherever it feels that clear no valid arbitration agreement exists between the parties. During this case, any one of the parties is to create AN application to the court concomitant with the first Arbitration Agreement or a punctually certified copy of the Agreement.

Court Intervention, once one party doesn’t possess copy of Arbitration Agreement

The Act empowers the court to entertain all such applications for intervention in matters of arbitration, wherever upon creating an application, the court is glad that, the applying party doesn’t possess the copy of the Arbitration Agreement and it not obtaining a replica, in its standard course, through the method of arbitration, then it’s the power to intervene and provides acceptable direction, `on the prayer of 1 party to the opposite party, to supply the first Arbitration Agreement or its punctually certified copy before the court. However, this tiny intervention of the court directional alternative party to supply Original Arbitration Agreement or certified true copy before the court doesn’t bar parties to refer the case to Arbitration.

Other Circumstances Of Court Intervention In Arbitration Proceedings

Section 34 of the Act, provides that the court has the power to line aside any arbitration award, once it’s once and for all evidenced that;  Any party to the arbitration has to suffer some incapacity throughout the proceedings, Any arbitration agreement used for securing a mediation award, isn’t valid below the law, if the agreement fails to the check of any indication created under its law, to that the parties have created is subject to,  The arbitration proceedings or any mediation award, during which arbitration proceedings haven’t followed the honest practices of law and it’s evidenced by any party that one among the parties, wasn’t given correct notice of the appointment of go-between If all parties to the dispute aren’t given correct intimation regarding proceedings of arbitration and If all parties aren’t given correct and honest chance to gift their case, before the arbitrators and once any party has lost its right of justice.

If mediation award deals with any matter, that wasn’t contemplated within the arbitration agreement,  If the terms of reference, created within the arbitration agreement are misunderstood, miss-referred or unmarked whereas delivering AN mediation award,  If the composition of the mediation award judicature isn’t in conformity with the agreement between the parties to the arbitration, If the arbitration award has created call selections on such matters, that is on the far side the scope or course of submission to the arbitration. In such a state of affairs, solely that a part of the mediation award, that is out of the context or reference, is also put aside.

If the procedure followed by the arbitrators, isn’t matching with the procedure in an agreement between the parties, If the procedure followed by the arbitrator’s area unit against the policy framework of the act and The court shall conjointly intervene once it concludes that the topic matter of any arbitration agreement is such, it cannot be determined or settled through proceedings of arbitration.


Business surroundings and for development, we have a tendency to needs speedy dispute resolution system. Arbitration is one of the simplest Alternate Dispute Resolution Procedures; parties to AN Arbitration Agreement refer all their disputes to arbitration for resolution. For AN arbitration continuing there ought to be AN Arbitration Agreement or AN article within the main contract clearly mentioning that each one dispute is mentioned arbitration aroused because of any breach of terms and conditions of the main agreement.

Previous Posts

Legal protection of the right to privacy in cyberspace

Legal Aspects of wildlife Conservation in India – A critical appraisal

Custodial Violence: A crime against Humanity

Creative commons: impact on Indian Copyright Law


State, Arbitration, Intervention, State Intervention in Arbitration