Kerala-High-Court-clarifies-that-Section-5-of-the-Limitation-Act-is-not-applicable-to-condone-delay-in-filing-a-plea-challenging-an-arbitration-award-under-Section-34-of-the-Arbitration-Act-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Kerala High Court clarifies that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to condone delay in filing a plea challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act

Kerala High Court clarifies that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to condone delay in filing a plea challenging an arbitration award…

Continue ReadingKerala High Court clarifies that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to condone delay in filing a plea challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability: Supreme Court

Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability Case: Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs NCC Limited Coram: Justices MR Shah…

Continue ReadingSection 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability: Supreme Court
Non-Filing Of Application U/S 8 Arbitration Act Before Civil Court Does Not Debar Party From Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator: J&K&L High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Non-Filing Of Application U/S 8 Arbitration Act Before Civil Court Does Not Debar Party From Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator: J&K&L High Court

Non-Filing Of Application U/S 8 Arbitration Act Before Civil Court Does Not Debar Party From Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator Case: Anita Mehta v Gulkand Hues…

Continue ReadingNon-Filing Of Application U/S 8 Arbitration Act Before Civil Court Does Not Debar Party From Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator: J&K&L High Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Section 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court

Section 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act Case: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs…

Continue ReadingSection 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Not Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court

Not Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act Case: I-Pay Clearing Services Private Limited…

Continue ReadingNot Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Bar U/s 9(3) Arbitration Act Not Applicable If Application Was Taken Up By Court Before Constitution Of Arbitration Tribunal: Supreme Court

Bar U/s 9(3) Arbitration Act Not Applicable If Application Was Taken Up By Court Before Constitution Of Arbitration Tribunal Case: Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India…

Continue ReadingBar U/s 9(3) Arbitration Act Not Applicable If Application Was Taken Up By Court Before Constitution Of Arbitration Tribunal: Supreme Court
Will Arbitral Award-Holder's Claim Be Extinguished On Approval Of Award-Debtor's Resolution Plan Under IBC? Yes, Rules Calcutta High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Will Arbitral Award-Holder’s Claim Be Extinguished On Approval Of Award-Debtor’s Resolution Plan Under IBC? Yes, Rules Calcutta High Court

Will Arbitral Award-Holder's Claim Be Extinguished On Approval Of Award-Debtor's Resolution Plan Under IBC? Yes, Rules Calcutta High Court Case: Sirpur Paper Mills Limited v.…

Continue ReadingWill Arbitral Award-Holder’s Claim Be Extinguished On Approval Of Award-Debtor’s Resolution Plan Under IBC? Yes, Rules Calcutta High Court
Acquittal Based on Benefits of Doubt in Serious Crime Cannot Make Candidate Eligible for Public Employment - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

High Court Under Article 226 And 227 Should Be Extremely Circumspect In Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act

High Court Under Article 226 And 227 Should Be Extremely Circumspect In Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act Case: Navayuga Engineering Company Vs. Bangalore…

Continue ReadingHigh Court Under Article 226 And 227 Should Be Extremely Circumspect In Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act