RTO Has Discretion To Reject Application For Permit Replacement If Proposed Vehicle Is Older Than The Existing One: Supreme Court Upholds Rule 174(2)( c) of Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

RTO Has Discretion To Reject Application For Permit Replacement If Proposed Vehicle Is Older Than The Existing One: Supreme Court Upholds Rule 174(2)( c) of Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules

RTO Has Discretion To Reject Application For Permit Replacement If Proposed Vehicle Is Older Than The Existing One: Supreme Court Upholds Rule 174(2)( c) of…

Continue ReadingRTO Has Discretion To Reject Application For Permit Replacement If Proposed Vehicle Is Older Than The Existing One: Supreme Court Upholds Rule 174(2)( c) of Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules
Article 226 - High Court Not Required To Reappreciate Evidence Or Interfere With Findings Recorded By Disciplinary Authority: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 226 – High Court Not Required To Reappreciate Evidence Or Interfere With Findings Recorded By Disciplinary Authority: Supreme Court

Article 226 - High Court Not Required To Reappreciate Evidence Or Interfere With Findings Recorded By Disciplinary Authority Case: Umesh Kumar Pahwa vs Board of…

Continue ReadingArticle 226 – High Court Not Required To Reappreciate Evidence Or Interfere With Findings Recorded By Disciplinary Authority: Supreme Court
Section 482 CrPC - There Has To Be Some Factual Supporting Material For FIR Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 482 CrPC – There Has To Be Some Factual Supporting Material For FIR Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

Section 482 CrPC - There Has To Be Some Factual Supporting Material For FIR Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Case: Shafiya Khan @ Shakuntala…

Continue ReadingSection 482 CrPC – There Has To Be Some Factual Supporting Material For FIR Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings
Affidavits Not Mere Sheets of Paper but Solemn Statements on Oath: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of NOIDA Plot Allotment - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Affidavits Not Mere Sheets of Paper but Solemn Statements on Oath: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of NOIDA Plot Allotment

Affidavits Not Mere Sheets of Paper but Solemn Statements on Oath: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of NOIDA Plot Allotment Case: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority…

Continue ReadingAffidavits Not Mere Sheets of Paper but Solemn Statements on Oath: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of NOIDA Plot Allotment
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Injurious Affection To Property May Stand On A Different Footing From Injurious Affection To Earnings: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Injurious Affection To Property May Stand On A Different Footing From Injurious Affection To Earnings: Supreme Court

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Injurious Affection To Property May Stand On A Different Footing From Injurious Affection To Earnings Case: Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. V.…

Continue ReadingLand Acquisition Act 1894 – Injurious Affection To Property May Stand On A Different Footing From Injurious Affection To Earnings: Supreme Court
CUSAT Statute 18 - Teacher Who Declines To Be HOD In First Rotation Not Barred From Appointed As HOD In Second Rotation: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

CUSAT Statute 18 – Teacher Who Declines To Be HOD In First Rotation Not Barred From Appointed As HOD In Second Rotation: Supreme Court

CUSAT Statute 18 - Teacher Who Declines To Be HOD In First Rotation Not Barred From Appointed As HOD In Second Rotation Case: Dr. Jagathy…

Continue ReadingCUSAT Statute 18 – Teacher Who Declines To Be HOD In First Rotation Not Barred From Appointed As HOD In Second Rotation: Supreme Court
Abhorrent Nature Of Crime Alone Cannot Be The Decisive Factor For Awarding Death Sentence; Mitigating Factors Equally Relevant: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Abhorrent Nature Of Crime Alone Cannot Be The Decisive Factor For Awarding Death Sentence; Mitigating Factors Equally Relevant: Supreme Court

Abhorrent Nature Of Crime Alone Cannot Be The Decisive Factor For Awarding Death Sentence; Mitigating Factors Equally Relevant Case: Pappu vs State of Uttar Pradesh…

Continue ReadingAbhorrent Nature Of Crime Alone Cannot Be The Decisive Factor For Awarding Death Sentence; Mitigating Factors Equally Relevant: Supreme Court
Magistrate Shall Not Entertain Application U/s 156(3) CrPC If It Is Not Supported By Complainants Affidavit: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Magistrate Shall Not Entertain Application U/s 156(3) CrPC If It Is Not Supported By Complainants Affidavit: Supreme Court

Magistrate Shall Not Entertain Application U/s 156(3) CrPC If It Is Not Supported By Complainants Affidavit Case: Babu Venkatesh vs. State of Karnataka Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingMagistrate Shall Not Entertain Application U/s 156(3) CrPC If It Is Not Supported By Complainants Affidavit: Supreme Court
There Is No Negative Equality; Benefit Conferred Without Legal Basis Cannot Be Relied Upon As A Principle Of Parity: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

There Is No Negative Equality; Benefit Conferred Without Legal Basis Cannot Be Relied Upon As A Principle Of Parity: Supreme Court

There Is No Negative Equality; Benefit Conferred Without Legal Basis Cannot Be Relied Upon As A Principle Of Parity Case: R. Muthukumar Vs Chairman And…

Continue ReadingThere Is No Negative Equality; Benefit Conferred Without Legal Basis Cannot Be Relied Upon As A Principle Of Parity: Supreme Court
Section 106 Evidence Act - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 106 Evidence Act Is Not Intended To Relieve Prosecution From Discharging Its Duty To Prove The Guilt Of The Accused: Supreme Court

Section 106 Evidence Act Is Not Intended To Relieve Prosecution From Discharging Its Duty To Prove The Guilt Of The Accused Case: Satye Singh vs…

Continue ReadingSection 106 Evidence Act Is Not Intended To Relieve Prosecution From Discharging Its Duty To Prove The Guilt Of The Accused: Supreme Court
Section 498A IPC - Prosecution Of Husband's Relatives Based On General & Omnibus Allegations By Wife Is Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants.com

Section 498A IPC – Prosecution Of Husband’s Relatives Based On General & Omnibus Allegations By Wife Is Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court

Section 498A IPC - Prosecution Of Husband's Relatives Based On General & Omnibus Allegations By Wife Is Abuse Of Process Case: Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam…

Continue ReadingSection 498A IPC – Prosecution Of Husband’s Relatives Based On General & Omnibus Allegations By Wife Is Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court
'Land Dedicated for Religious Purpose Not Immune From Its Vesting With State': Supreme Court Quashes AP Wakf Board Notification Declaring 1654 Acres Land As Wakf Property - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

‘Land Dedicated for Religious Purpose Not Immune From Its Vesting With State’: Supreme Court Quashes AP Wakf Board Notification Declaring 1654 Acres Land As Wakf Property

'Land Dedicated for Religious Purpose Not Immune From Its Vesting With State': Supreme Court Quashes AP Wakf Board Notification Declaring 1654 Acres Land As Wakf…

Continue Reading‘Land Dedicated for Religious Purpose Not Immune From Its Vesting With State’: Supreme Court Quashes AP Wakf Board Notification Declaring 1654 Acres Land As Wakf Property
Every Action Of State Is Required To Be Guided By Non­-arbitrariness, Reasonableness & Rationality: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Every Action Of State Is Required To Be Guided By Non­-arbitrariness, Reasonableness & Rationality: Supreme Court

Every Action Of State Is Required To Be Guided By Non­-arbitrariness, Reasonableness & Rationality Case: Southern Power Distribution Power Company Limited of Andhra Pradesh (APSPDCL)…

Continue ReadingEvery Action Of State Is Required To Be Guided By Non­-arbitrariness, Reasonableness & Rationality: Supreme Court
Limited Estate Given To Hindu Wife By Way Of Will Can Become Absolute Under Sec14(1) Hindu Succession Act Only If Property Was Given For Her Maintenance: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Limited Estate Given To Hindu Wife By Way Of Will Can Become Absolute Under Sec14(1) Hindu Succession Act Only If Property Was Given For Her Maintenance: Supreme Court

Limited Estate Given To Hindu Wife By Way Of Will Can Become Absolute Under Sec14(1) Hindu Succession Act Only If Property Was Given For Her…

Continue ReadingLimited Estate Given To Hindu Wife By Way Of Will Can Become Absolute Under Sec14(1) Hindu Succession Act Only If Property Was Given For Her Maintenance: Supreme Court
Criminal Court Can Try A Case Against Army Man If Commanding Officer Does Not Exercise Discretion U/Sec 125 Army Act To Initiate Court-Martial: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Criminal Court Can Try A Case Against Army Man If Commanding Officer Does Not Exercise Discretion U/Sec 125 Army Act To Initiate Court-Martial: Supreme Court

Criminal Court Can Try A Case Against Army Man If Commanding Officer Does Not Exercise Discretion U/Sec 125 Army Act To Initiate Court-Martial Case: State…

Continue ReadingCriminal Court Can Try A Case Against Army Man If Commanding Officer Does Not Exercise Discretion U/Sec 125 Army Act To Initiate Court-Martial: Supreme Court
Intent of Army Act is Not to Protect Army Personnel by Awarding Them Lesser Punishment Even for Serious Offences: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Intent of Army Act is Not to Protect Army Personnel by Awarding Them Lesser Punishment Even for Serious Offences: Supreme Court

Intent Of Army Act Is Not To Protect Army Personnel By Awarding Them Lesser Punishment Even For Serious Offences Case: State of Sikkim vs Jasbir…

Continue ReadingIntent of Army Act is Not to Protect Army Personnel by Awarding Them Lesser Punishment Even for Serious Offences: Supreme Court
Disobedience Has To Be Wilful To Attract Civil Contempt Action Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC: Supreme Court In Future-Amazon Case - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Disobedience Has To Be Wilful To Attract Civil Contempt Action Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC: Supreme Court In Future-Amazon Case

Disobedience Has To Be Wilful To Attract Civil Contempt Action Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC: Supreme Court In Future-Amazon Case Case: Future Retail Ltd…

Continue ReadingDisobedience Has To Be Wilful To Attract Civil Contempt Action Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC: Supreme Court In Future-Amazon Case