Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Motor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To ‘Future Prospects’ Even If Deceased Was Not Earning: Supreme Court

Motor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To 'Future Prospects' Even If Deceased Was Not Earning Case: Meena Pawaia vs Ashraf Ali Coram: Justices MR Shah and…

Continue ReadingMotor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To ‘Future Prospects’ Even If Deceased Was Not Earning: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Constitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry: Supreme Court

Constitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry Case: National Confederation of Officers Association of Central Public Sector…

Continue ReadingConstitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Sec 7 POCSO – Main Ingredient Of Offence Of ‘Sexual Assault’ Is ‘Sexual Intent’ And Not ‘Skin To Skin” Contact: Supreme Court

Sec 7 POCSO - Main Ingredient Of Offence Of 'Sexual Assault' Is 'Sexual Intent' And Not 'Skin To Skin" Contact Case: Attorney General for India…

Continue ReadingSec 7 POCSO – Main Ingredient Of Offence Of ‘Sexual Assault’ Is ‘Sexual Intent’ And Not ‘Skin To Skin” Contact: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Restricting ‘Touch’ Or ‘Physical Contact’ Only To ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Absurd: Supreme Court Reverses Bombay HC’s POCSO Judgment

Restricting 'Touch' Or 'Physical Contact' Only To 'Skin To Skin' Contact Absurd Case: Attorney General for India versus Satish and another Coram: Justice Uday Umesh…

Continue ReadingRestricting ‘Touch’ Or ‘Physical Contact’ Only To ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Absurd: Supreme Court Reverses Bombay HC’s POCSO Judgment
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

‘Ambush PILs’ Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won’t Operate As Res Judicata: Supreme Court

'Ambush PILs' Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won't Operate As Res Judicata Case: National Confederation of Officers Association…

Continue Reading‘Ambush PILs’ Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won’t Operate As Res Judicata: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Conviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable: Supreme Court

Conviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable Case: Bijender @ Mandar vs State of Haryana Coram: CJI NV…

Continue ReadingConviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Article 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court’s Judgment Is Possible: Supreme Court

Article 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court's Judgment Is Possible Case: State Of Kerala & Anr. V. M/S…

Continue ReadingArticle 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court’s Judgment Is Possible: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Principle Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary: Supreme Court

Principle Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary Case: Sudhir Kumar Atrey vs Union of…

Continue ReadingPrinciple Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Non-Residential Club Won’t Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There: Supreme Court

Non-Residential Club Won't Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There Case: P.B. Nayak And Ors. v. Managing Director, Bhilai…

Continue ReadingNon-Residential Club Won’t Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

If Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable: Supreme Court

If Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable Case: Caparo Engineering India Ltd. V. Ummed…

Continue ReadingIf Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Taluk Land Board’s Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act: Supreme Court

Taluk Land Board's Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act Case: State Of Kerala & Anr. V. M/S Popular Estates…

Continue ReadingTaluk Land Board’s Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Evidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence: Supreme Court

Evidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence…

Continue ReadingEvidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence: Supreme Court