“Utter Lack of Objectivity”: Bombay High Court On CWCD’s Refusal To Renew Licenses of 57 Child Care Homes
Case: Mother Teresa Balakashram Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors., with connected matters
Coram: Justices Magesh Patil and Sandeep Marne
Case No.: Writ Petition No. 7821 Of 2021
Court Observation: “The impugned communication is bereft of any concrete ground or reason for communication. …[It] clearly demonstrates utter lack of any objectivity in decision making process and even has been taken without following the principles of natural Justice”
“He seems to have taken a bold decision of out-rightly rejecting the proposals of as many as 57 institutions in one stroke by the same communication…”
“We are afraid, it is a sheer afterthought. If the respondent no. 2 was of the opinion that the proposals of the petitioners’ were deficient in some specific respect, he should have firstly notified the objections to the petitioners and called upon them to comply with it before taking any drastic decision of straightway rejecting the proposals.”
Previous Posts
Delhi High Court Restores Bail In View Of Disputed Fact About Accused Threatening Complainant
Keywords
Renew Licenses
