Dispose Of Execution Proceedings Within Six Months From The Date Of Filing: Supreme Court Issues Directions To Reduce Delay

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Dispose Of Execution Proceedings Within Six Months From The Date Of Filing: Supreme Court Issues Directions To Reduce Delay

Case: Rahul S Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi

Coram: CJI SA Bobde, Justices L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat

Case No: [CA 1659-1660 of 2021]

Court Observation: These provisions contemplate that for execution of decrees, Executing Court must not go beyond the decree. However, there is steady rise of proceedings akin to a re-trial at the time of execution causing failure of realisation of fruits of decree and relief which the party seeks from the courts despite there being a decree in their favour. Experience has shown that various objections are filed before the Executing Court and the decree holder is deprived of the fruits of the litigation and the judgment debtor, in abuse of process of law, is allowed to benefit from the subject matter which he is otherwise not entitled to.

The general practice prevailing in the subordinate courts is that invariably in all execution applications, the Courts first issue show cause notice asking the judgment debtor as to why the decree should not be executed as is given under Order XXI Rule 22 for certain class of cases. However, this is often misconstrued as the beginning of a new trial. For example, the judgement debtor sometimes misuses the provisions of Order XXI Rule 2 and Order XXI Rule 11 to set up an oral plea, which invariably leaves no option with the Court but to record oral evidence which may be frivolous. This drags the execution proceedings indefinitely..

This is anti-thesis to the scheme of Civil Procedure Code, which stipulates that in civil suit, all questions and issues that may arise, must be decided in one and the same trial. Order I and Order II which relate to Parties to Suits and Frame of Suits with the object of avoiding multiplicity of proceedings, provides for joinder of parties and joinder of cause of action so that common questions of law and facts could be decided at one go.

We are of the opinion that to avoid controversies and multiple issues of a very vexed question emanating from the rights claimed by third parties, the Court must play an active role in deciding all such related issues to the subject matter during adjudication of the suit itself and ensure that a clear, unambiguous, and executable decree is passed in any suit.

[doc id=4828]

Previous Posts

Testimony Of Disabled Witness Cannot Be Considered Week Or Inferior: SC Issues Guidelines To Make Criminal Justice System More Disabled-friendly

Liberty Is Important But Courts Must Consider Potential Threat To Witnesses, Victims While Granting Bail

Power Under Section 482 CrPC Cannot Be Used To Undermine Statutory Dictate Under Section 14, 17 IBC

GST – Provisional Attachment Power ‘Draconian’; Not Intended To Authorize Commissioners To Make Preemptive Strikes On Assessee’s Property

Indian Parties Can Choose A Foreign Seat For Arbitration Download Judgement


Dispose Of Execution Proceedings, Six Months, Date Of Filing