Supreme Court Disapproves Practice Of Delayed Filing Of Review Petition After Judges Retire

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Supreme Court Disapproves Practice Of Delayed Filing Of Review Petition After Judges Retire

Case: Vedanta Ltd. vs. The Goa Foundation

Coram: Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah

Case No: [Review Petition (Civil) Diary No. 18447 of 2020]

Court Observation: “Such practice must be firmly disapproved to preserve the institutional sanctity of the decision making of this Court”

“The judges comprising the two-judge bench in Goa Foundation II, Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta, retired from this Court on 30 December 2018 and 6 May 2020, respectively. The State of Goa preferred its four review petitions in the month of November 2019, after Justice Madan B Lokur’s retirement, while Vedanta Limited preferred its four review petitions in the month of August 2020, right after Justice Deepak Gupta’s retirement. Such practise must be firmly disapproved to preserve the institutional sanctity of the decision making of this Court. The review petitioners were aware of the decision of this Court.”

[doc id=7169]

Previous Posts

Section 34 Arbitration Act Gives No Power To Modify Arbitral Award; Appellate Court Can Only Set Aside Or Remand: Supreme Court

Section 482 CrPC: Interim Protection Order Can Be Passed In Exceptional Cases Giving Brief Reasons: Supreme Court

‘Judges Must Not Behave Like Emperors’: Supreme Court Strongly Condemns High Courts’ Practice Of Summoning Of Public Officers Unnecessarily

Facebook Can’t Disrupt India’s ‘Unity In Diversity’ Claiming Ignorance Or Lack Of Pivotal Role: Supreme Court

‘Judicial System Exists For Common Man’: Supreme Court Emphasizes The Need To Write Short & Clear Judgments & Restrict Time For Oral Submissions

‘Court Cannot Be Unmindful Of The Impact Of Covid’: SC Refuses To Disturb Admission Of B-Tech Students Admitted Without Entrance Test

Managements Of Colleges Acting And Later Projecting Students To Claim Equities Is Deplorable: Supreme Court

Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Is Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction: Supreme Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Protection To Muslim Woman Who Converted To Hinduism To Marry Hindu Man

Dismissal Of An Earlier Section 482 CrPC Petition Does Not Bar Filing Of Subsequent Petition If Facts So Justify: Supreme Court Download Judgement

Keywords

Disapproves Practice, Delayed Filing, Review Petition